ASSESSMENT VISIT REPORT

 

Name of Congregation:              Unitarian Universalist Church of Fort Lauderdale

                                                3970 NW 21st Avenue

                                                Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

                                                954.484.6734

954.484.6778    fax

 

Minister:              Reverend Gail Tapscott  (settled in 1999)

954.759.6529     home

RevGailTapscott@aol.como:p>

 

President:            Gary Ladka

                        954.969.7221 home

                        954.650.3228 cell  

                        GLinFLA@aol.com

 

Contact Person:             Scott Bejlovec

                                    954.786.0185 home

                                    954.254.8098 cell

bejlovecs@aol.com

 

Number of Members:   128                             Number of Pledge Units:    99

Annual Pledge Income:             $86,127                    Annual Budget:  $171,600

Average Pledge:   $870                                       Median Pledge:   $600

Mortgage:  No mortgage.  Member notes totaling $37,000 are outstanding as of 9/30/03.

Cash reserves as of 10/30/03:  $2,500                        Endowment as of 9/30/03:  $185,532

Building Fund Reserve:  $305,800

 

Do they conduct a face-to-face Every Member Canvass?  No.

 

Date and Purpose of last Capital Campaign:  The last campaign was in 1985 or 1986 in order to build the current facility on 21st Avenue.

 

List of anti-oppression and anti-racist Initiatives:  None

 

List of UUA Staff/Consultants in last three years:  None

 

Does the congregation have current Vision and Mission Statement and Long Range Plan?  The congregation adopted a mission statement in 1994 and a long-range plan in 2001.  However, one-half of the current membership has joined since the long-range plan was adopted.  Also the congregation, in my opinion, lacks a clear focus on who it is or wants to be (the Vision) and has therefore not yet clearly defined its missions.

 

Describe proposed project and estimated costs:  The present proposal is to build a second building that would have a social hall, an improved kitchen, and two accessible toilets.  The preliminary cost estimate is $700,000 to $750,000.

 

Several years ago, a key member of the congregation died and left the Church over $300,000 that can only be used for a building project.  The congregational vote to establish the Building Expansion Committee was premised, in large part, on the need to expend those funds.  For the last couple of years, the interest earned on this legacy gift has been used to subsidize the operating budget.

 

What steps have been taken to prepare for this project?  The Building Expansion Committee surveyed the congregation as to the most important building projects.  Based on those results, some preliminary designs have been developed and discussed with the congregation.  The Building Expansion Committee appears to have been following the will of the congregation, but now that the projected cost will exceed the bequest and require substantial fundraising from the members of the congregation, more concerns are being expressed.

 

Did you meet with the minister?  Yes.  She supports the effort of the lay leaders but is concerned that the new members have not participated in the decision.  She also feels that it would be a good idea for the congregation to reexamine its mission statement, develop a new vision and mission statement, and a strategic plan to guide it in the future.  If successful, such an accomplishment would mark a major change in the way this congregation has done business.

 

What did you recommend?  I recommended that work on the project as now constituted be set aside until a new Vision and Mission statement is developed and a strategic plan, based on that vision and mission statement and containing estimates of income and expenditures for the next five years, is approved by the congregation.  Without a clear sense of direction, it is difficult to tell if the current project is the one that responds to the most urgent requirements.

 

The strategic plan is also needed for another reason.  Currently, the budget of slightly over $170,000 is funded by $90,000 of pledges.  The balance of the income comes from rentals ($35,000), income from the building fund ($12,000), special fundraisers and other sources.  Cash reserves are virtually non-existent.  In my opinion, the continuation of the essential programs of the church is at risk since almost 50% of the income comes from other than pledges and could drop or be severely diminished at any time.

 

In addition, six members still hold $37,000 in notes from the previous construction project.  Those notes come due at the end of this year.  The plan is to ask the note holders to extend the loans for an unspecified period of time.  Given the potential problems associated with member notes, particularly ones that are maturing, I recommended that the notes be paid off with a short-term loan from the endowment that is ultimately repaid as part of the capital fund drive.

 

I also recommended that the congregation hold a Searching for the Future workshop as soon as practicable, use the information from that workshop to turn the existing long-range plan into a strategic plan, and then validate the building requirements.  The details are in the attached tentative schedule for a capital campaign.

 

What action will be taken?  The Board will consider these recommendations at its meeting in December 2003.

 

When is a campaign likely to take place?  If the recommendations are accepted and the project or a modified project proves feasible, the capital campaign will probably be in January 2005.

 

Comments about particular consulting needs.   The congregation has not done a face-to-face canvass in a number of years.  It is currently in the midst of this year’s canvass that involves no personal contact as far as I can determine.  As noted earlier, the mean pledge is $870 and the median $600.  Those figures are low in comparison to other congregations with which I have worked in Florida.

 

In addition to the usual consulting needs associated with a capital campaign, this congregation could use some help with strategic planning and every member canvass.  It could also benefit from the District Executive’s help with leadership development and membership growth and retention issues.

 

 

 

 

 

David L. Rickard

UUA Congregational Fundraising Consultant

November 25, 2003

 

 Return to Building Page